How Could Pollution Possibly Harm You?
Posted by feww on March 20, 2010
It’s NO longer science, NOT even common sense; it’s ‘corporment’ at its worst!
The Exponential Growth Economy Dilemma is Fast Shaping up
1. The only way to live in this world is through exponential growth economy.
2. Exponential growth economy is responsible for the deadly pollution and looming environmental collapse and extinction of human race.
Solution: Deny pollution’s role in the environmental collapse; sue EPA to prove the point.
Up to 20 states have filed suits against EPA asking U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Washington, D.C. to review EPA’s finding that greenhouse gases endanger both human health and welfare. The finding, which was released in December 2009 (it was prompted by a 2007 U.S. Supreme Court ruling), enables the agency to regulate GHG emissions under the existing Clean Air Act.
States sue EPA to stop greenhouse gas rules
At least 15 U.S. states have sued the Environmental Protection Agency seeking to stop it from issuing rules controlling greenhouse gas emissions until it reexamines whether the pollution harms human health.
Florida, Indiana, South Carolina and at least nine other states filed the petitions in the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Washington, D.C. on Thursday, states said.
They joined petitions filed last month by Virginia, Texas and Alabama.
The Obama administration has long said it would attack greenhouse gas emissions with EPA regulation if Congress failed to pass a climate bill.
The EPA is set to issue regulations later this month that would require autos and light trucks to increase energy efficiency. That would trigger rules on large emitters like power plants requiring them to get permits showing they are using the best technology available to reduce emissions.
The state petitions call for the EPA to reopen hearings on the so-called “endangerment finding” the agency issued last year declaring the emissions dangerous to people.
“If EPA doesn’t reopen the hearings we will move forward to try to stop them from regulating greenhouse gases,” said Brian Gottstein, an assistant to Virginia’s Attorney General Kenneth Cuccinelli.
The states have complained that the EPA relied too heavily from reports by the U.N.’s climate science panel which included information that exaggerated the melting of Himalayan glaciers.
The EPA said it was confident it would withstand legal challenges on the issue. “The question of the science is settled,” spokeswoman Adora Andy said. The science “came from an array of highly respected, peer-reviewed sources from both within the United States and across the globe, and took into consideration hundreds of thousands of comments from members of the public, which were addressed in the finding,” she said.
Allison Wood, a lawyer at Hunton & Williams, said the suits could push some lawmakers to support the climate bill if they oppose EPA regulation and the legislation preempts the agency from taking action.
About the same number of states support the EPA. In January, 16 states including New York and California asked the court for permission to support the EPA in industry lawsuits seeking to stop the agency from regulating the gases from stationary sources like power plants and factories.
Copyright: Reuters – http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE62I4DP20100319
Make NO mistake: Preserving the lives of corporations is more important than preventing the extinction of human race! [Are they too stupid to matter?]
- 133,000,000 Wise Monkeys
- Google’s Top 10 List of ‘Holy Cows’
- Ten Climate Change Lies, Myths and Misconceptions
- The things EPA capo won’t do!
- California Sues EPA on GHG Emissions
- Antienvironmental, Antisocial, Anti American!
- Friend of the Environment
- Shameful EPA slammed with yet another lawsuit
- Arnie Knows the Score!
- EPA Plays Piggy In the Middle
- The White House of Horror!!
- Disgrace, Disgrace, You’re Such an Ugly Disgrace …
- EPA official resigns citing Dow Chemical
Related EPA Links: